CHIVAYO DIES IN HELICOPTER CRASH
DANGOTE SHRUGS OFF LAMU PROTESTS, BRACES FOR COURT BATTLE
ATWOLI CALLS FOR UHURU'S ARREST OVER RAILA 2022 CLAIMS
Karura race draws more than 1,000 runners ahead of Nairobi Marathon
ZELENSKYY FLAGS KENYA TO UN OVER RUSSIA WAR RECRUITMENT
IRAN-US LOCK HORNS AT UNGA
UHURU BACK ON 2027 POLITICAL FRONTLINE AFTER COURT RULING
KAIKAI DISPUTES OMBIJA’S CLAIM GACHAGUA SOUGHT HIS SACKING
NOLLYWOOD ICON OLU JACOB DIES AT 84
A fresh legal battle has been launched to remove National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula, with petitioners accusing him of defying court orders by declaring Kenya Kwanza the majority party.
The petition, led by Kenneth Njagi Njiru, urges the High Court to rule that Wetang’ula is unfit to serve as Speaker. The group argues that he ignored a previous court judgment by insisting that Azimio la Umoja One Kenya Coalition Party remains the minority party in the National Assembly.
The petitioners want the court to declare all parliamentary proceedings conducted after the judgment null and void. They also seek a ruling that bars Wetang’ula from continuing as Speaker unless he resigns from his leadership roles in Ford Kenya and Kenya Kwanza.
Just a week ago, the National Assembly dismissed another attempt to censure Wetang’ula. The Grassroot Oversight Initiative had sought to challenge his leadership, but Parliament Clerk Samuel Njoroge shut down the effort, stating that only a Member of Parliament can initiate such a motion.
“We have reviewed the Constitution, the Petition to Parliament (Procedure) Act, 2012, and the National Assembly Standing Orders. Standing Order 87(1) stipulates that the Speaker’s conduct can only be discussed through a substantive motion with at least three days’ notice,” Njoroge wrote.
Laban Omusundi, executive director of the Grassroot Civilian Oversight Initiative, had petitioned Parliament, urging MPs to initiate a motion against Wetang’ula. However, with the Clerk’s response, the effort hit a dead end.
Omusundi accused Wetang’ula of engaging in political activities that compromise the neutrality expected of his office, a role that should remain independent of partisan influence.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!